In the following figure, rectangle represents Hairstylists, circle represents Food stylists, triangle represents Playwrights and square represents Indians. Which set of letters represents Indians who are not Hairstylists?

Which of the statements given below are correct?

A) In 2017, Lewis Hamilton raced in Formula One for Mercedes.

B) In 2018 IPL auctions, Mumbai Indians retained Hardik Pandya.

C) Chen Meng won the Table Tennis 2017 ITTF World Tour Grand Finals Women's Singles.

To enlarge their hold over India, many wars were fought between British and Indians but NOT one of the following.

Which of the statements given below are correct?

A) Grigor Dimitrov won the Tennis 2017 ATP World Tour Finals Men's Singles.

B) In 2017, Sergio Aguero played for the Premier League team Liverpool.

C) In 2017, Rohit Sharma captained the IPL team Mumbai Indians.

In the following figure, rectangle represents Psychologists, circle represents Curators, triangle represents Comedians and square represents Indians. Which set of letters represents Indians who are both Curators as well as Psychologists?

In the following figure, rectangle represents Actors, circle represents Art critics, triangle represents Photographers and square represents Indians. Which set of letters represents Photographers who are either Actors or Art critics ?

Which of these Indians has been awarded with Bharat Ratna?

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.

Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything 'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I, or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar to the understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken in India. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is in their own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape, cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared to that of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? The onus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify?

According to the writer the responsibility of explaining the facts about India to Europeans rests with?