As any economist knows, healthy people pose less of an economic burden to society than unhealthy people. Not surprisingly, then, every dollar our state government spends on prenatal care for undocumented immigrants will save taxpayers of this state three dollars.
Which of the following, if true, would best explain why the statistics cited above are not surprising?
A) The state's taxpayers pay for prenatal care of all ...........immigrants.
B) Pregnant women who do not receive prenatal care are ...........more likely to experience health problems than ...........other pregnant women.
C) Both A and B
D) None
A) The state's taxpayers pay for prenatal care of all ...........immigrants.
B) Pregnant women who do not receive prenatal care are ...........more likely to experience health problems than ...........other pregnant women.
C) Both A and B
D) None
Answer & ExplanationAnswer: B) Pregnant women who do not receive prenatal care are ...........more likely to experience health problems than ...........other pregnant women.
Explanation:
From the above passage this will only be true Pregnant women who do not receive prenatal care are ...........more likely to experience health problems than ...........other pregnant women.
The food processing industry was touted to be a sunrise industry for India some years ago and, on the face of it , there was little reason to doubt that
Conclusions:
I. India has an advantage in food processing because of the varied agro-climatic conditions and availabilty of raw materials.
II.Food processing is one of the basic industries which suports our lives.
Which factors influence the food processing industry cannot be determined from the statement. Hence I does not follow. II does not follow because the statement doesn't give any clue about the industry's centrality to our lives.
Nowadays, computers have entered all walks of life and children need to be prepared for the same. So, argument II is strong. Argument I holds no relevance.