Verbal Reasoning - Logical Deduction Questions

Read the statement below followed by two arguments.
Statement:
Should there be strict laws for maintaining ponds and lakes?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it will naturally maintain the water level for generations to come. It affects the migration of birds too.
II. No, it comes in the way of modern urban development and growth. Which argument(s) of the below is/are strong in the context of the statement?

In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.

Statement:
(I) If we are lucky then things automatically fall in place.
(II) Luck follows only when we work hard.

Conclusions:
(I) Hard work is the key to success.
(II) If you don’t work hard, luck will not follow you.

Who has the best overall health?

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion
logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
I. Some girls are clever.
II. All clever are hardworking.

Conclusions:
I. Some girls are not hardworking.
II. Some girls are hardworking.
III. Some hardworking are not girls.

Given below is a statement followed by some conclusions. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.

Statement : All poets are readers. No reader is wise.

Conclusions :
I. No poet is wise.
II. All readers are poets.

Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.

Statement:

No dog is a cat.

Some cats are rats.

All rats are pigs.

Conclusions:

1. All dogs are rats

2. All pigs are rats

3. Some pigs are cats

4. No pig is a dog

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.

Statement I: All napkins are towels

Statement II: All rags are napkins

Conclusion I: Some towels are rags

Conclusion II: All rags are towels

 Which of the following will be definitely true if the given expression T≥U≥M=N<J=P<Q≤R is definitely true?