Aptitude and Reasoning Questions

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.

Statement I: All napkins are towels

Statement II: All rags are napkins

Conclusion I: Some towels are rags

Conclusion II: All rags are towels

A man spend 20% of his monthly salary on his children's education and 50% of his salary on food and transport. After Paying the rent of Rs.1000, he is left with Rs.2000. What is his monthly salary?

Should the teenagers be denied access to the Internet?

Arguments : 

I. Yes. Most of the children, particularly the teenegers, are found indulging in accessing pornographic contents.

II. No. Denying access to the internet would mean denying access to a lot of useful information ; instead the access may be controlled

Consider the given arguments as true and decide which of the given assumptions is/are implicit.

Argument :
Public smoking is an offence underthe law.

Assumptions :
1. Smoking is injurious to the health of the person who smoke.
2. Smoke is injurious even to others health in the public places.

If the radius of base and height of a cone are increased by 10%, find the percentage of increase of its volume

Choose the number which is different from others in the group?

Rajitha invested 25% more than Santhosh. Santhosh invested 30% less than Raju, who invested Rs. 6,000. What is the ratio of the amount that Rajitha invested to the total amount invested by all of them together ?

Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements.

Statement:

No dog is a cat.

Some cats are rats.

All rats are pigs.

Conclusions:

1. All dogs are rats

2. All pigs are rats

3. Some pigs are cats

4. No pig is a dog